![]() ![]() End Citizens United argues in its complaint that No Labels appears to primarily be engaged in political work “to oppose the candidacies of Joe Biden and Donald Trump.” It also argues that No Labels runs afoul of a separate provision against the activities of the group primarily benefiting a private party - in this case, No Labels. Under a widely held interpretation of IRS rules, political nonprofit groups are limited to making political activity 50% of their activity. Still, campaign finance experts say many of the legal arguments made by the Democratic groups are solid. The IRS, meanwhile, has largely shrunk from enforcement ever since attempts to crack down on tea party groups during Barack Obama's presidency drew massive backlash. The FEC board, which is split evenly between those aligned with Democrats and those aligned with Republicans, frequently deadlocks. If the Democrat-aligned groups are successful, No Labels would not only be compelled to register as a formal political party with the Federal Election Commission, but it would also have its tax-exempt status revoked, be forced to abide by the same donation amount limits as other political parties and be required to reveal its big-money donors.īoth the FEC and the IRS have been hesitant in recent years to police groups that push the boundaries of campaign finance law. That has enabled No Labels to operate with limited transparency while accepting unlimited sums from an anonymous set of donors - a source of financing often referred to pejoratively as “dark money.” But while the group has established No Labels political parties in numerous states, at the national level it is actually registered as a nonprofit with the IRS. No Labels regularly promotes itself as a “common sense” centrist organization. In a statement, No Labels on Wednesday disputed any suggestion that the group had done anything improper and dismissed the complaints as part of a “coordinated conspiracy to subvert No Labels’ ballot access and limit Americans' choices.” That’s going to siphon off votes from President Biden and reelect Donald Trump." “I don’t think it's any secret that No Labels is a threat to our democracy if they run a third-party (candidate). “We are continuing to work every single avenue with our partners to hold (No Labels) accountable legally, to expose them publicly and to make sure they are playing by the same rules as everyone else,” said Tiffany Muller, the president of End Citizens United. The complaints, filed by the groups End Citizens United and Accountable.US, are part of a broader Democratic effort to ramp up legal scrutiny and elicit public scorn for No Labels as it teases a possible White House run by an as-of-yet unannounced ticket that many Democrats worry will play electoral spoiler. Now, with a rematch between Biden and Trump looking likely, two Democratic-aligned groups this week filed campaign finance complaints, hoping to crimp No Labels' pipeline of campaign cash and force the group to follow the same rules as formal political parties. ![]() ![]() WASHINGTON – For months, the centrist group No Labels has stockpiled cash and diligently worked to secure ballot access for a potential third-party presidential bid, striking fear among allies of President Joe Biden that the effort could siphon away votes and hand the White House to Donald Trump.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |